PAT · Method index · 50 methods

The PAT Method Library

Fifty habits rather than fifty topics: what to do when a physics problem does not tell you what to do. Each one says when to reach for it and lists every question here that drills it. 50 methods in 5 groups, 100 question links.

About this test

The PAT no longer runs, and these methods still matter

Oxford retired the Physics Aptitude Test after the October 2025 sitting. For Physics, for Physics and Philosophy and for Engineering Science, Oxford now uses the ESAT. Nobody reading this page is about to sit the PAT, and nothing here should be read as advice about a test you are preparing for.

The methods are published anyway, because they are the part that transfers. Every habit below is what an Oxford physics interview rewards and what the ESAT rewards: estimating a quantity nobody has measured, letting the units tell you the shape of an answer, staying in symbols until the last line, deciding what is small enough to neglect and saying so out loud, and testing a result against a world whose size you already know. None of that retired with the paper.

If you have a test to sit this cycle, start at the ESAT pages. That is the test these courses now use, and that material is written and checked by hand rather than drafted by a model. Come back here for the habits.

This page says nothing about how long any paper was, what you were allowed to take into it, or how it was marked. Those things changed between cycles and are not a claim a page like this should make. What is described here is how to think about a physics problem.

How to use this library

Read the method name first, then the sentence under it, which says when to reach for it. These are not topics, and the difference is the whole point. A topic index tells you what a question is about, which you already know by the time you are stuck. This one tells you what to do next, which is the thing that was actually being tested.

The five groups are five habits: estimate when you cannot calculate, let the units do work, stay in symbols and substitute last, decide which effect dominates, and check the answer against physical reality. Run them in that order against an unfamiliar problem and you will almost always have something to say inside a minute, which in an interview is most of what is being watched.

When a question defeats you, come back to its method here and work the others listed against it. Seeing one habit in four different settings is what makes it transfer, and transfer is the entire reason this page exists for a test that no longer runs.

Every question listed against a method carries that method in its own source file. This page is generated from those files, so it cannot advertise a question that does not exist, and it cannot claim a method that a question does not name.

Contents

33 of 50 methods currently have at least one question against them, from 100 question links across 6 papers on disk. The remaining 17 are named because the test rewarded them and are next in line as the corpus grows; a method with no question is listed as having none rather than quietly dropped.

Order-of-magnitude estimation

Some questions cannot be answered exactly and are not meant to be. The skill is to turn a quantity nobody has measured into a product of quantities you can each defend, to keep the arithmetic in powers of ten, and to stop at the precision your worst input supports. An interviewer asking how many piano tuners work in a city is not testing arithmetic: they are watching whether you decompose the problem out loud, commit to numbers, and stay honest about how uncertain the result is. These families cover the decomposition itself, the choice of inputs, and the discipline of reporting an estimate rather than a false answer.

Break one impossible estimate into factors you can each guess

1 question

Reach for this when the quantity is impossible to look up but can be written as a product of two or three factors you can each guess to within a factor of a few.

Practise: Mock 2 Paper 1 Q5

Choose a round number you can defend out loud

0 questions

Reach for this when a messy input would let the arithmetic dominate the thinking, and a round value you can justify keeps the estimate both quick and honest.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Estimate by comparison with something whose size you already know

0 questions

Reach for this when you have no formula but do know the size of something comparable, so the estimate becomes a ratio rather than a calculation.

Practise: No question drills this yet

One significant figure is often the honest answer

1 question

Reach for this whenever the inputs are guesses, because carrying more digits than the weakest input supports invents a precision that is not there.

Practise: Mock 6 Paper 1 Q8

Count by dividing the big thing by the small thing

3 questions

Reach for this when the question is really how many of one thing fit inside another, whether in length, area, volume or time.

Practise: Mock 2 Paper 1 Q1 · Mock 3 Paper 1 Q9 · Mock 4 Paper 1 Q17

A rate multiplied by a time, and be honest about the time

2 questions

Reach for this when a quantity accumulates, so the estimate is a rate times a duration and the duration is usually the part worth arguing about.

Practise: Mock 4 Paper 1 Q10 · Mock 5 Paper 1 Q6

Find the one factor your estimate is most at the mercy of

0 questions

Reach for this when an estimate is challenged, because only the factor with the widest plausible range is worth defending or refining.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Between two bounds, take the geometric mean, not the average

0 questions

Reach for this when your two bounds are a factor of ten or more apart, where an arithmetic mean would sit far too close to the upper bound.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Dimensional analysis

Every physical equation is a statement about quantities that carry units, and that constraint is strong enough to do real work. Dimensions can hand you the form of a relationship you have never derived, rule out a route before you follow it, rebuild a formula you have forgotten, and catch in seconds a slip that would otherwise survive to the final line. What they cannot supply is the dimensionless factor out front, and knowing where that boundary sits is part of the method. These families cover deriving, checking and recovering with dimensions, together with the bookkeeping habits that keep units usable.

Assume a product of powers, then let the dimensions fix the exponents

4 questions

Reach for this when asked how a quantity depends on the others and no derivation is available, since a product of powers plus dimensional consistency usually pins the exponents.

Practise: Mock 2 Paper 1 Q2 · Mock 3 Paper 1 Q10 · Mock 4 Paper 1 Q8 · Mock 5 Paper 1 Q10

A dimensionally impossible route is wrong before it is finished

1 question

Reach for this when several routes look plausible, since a route that would add unlike quantities can be abandoned before any effort is spent on it.

Practise: Mock 6 Paper 1 Q10

Collect the variables into one dimensionless group

0 questions

Reach for this when a problem has too many variables, because the behaviour usually depends on a few dimensionless combinations rather than on each variable separately.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Recover a forgotten formula from the units it must have

2 questions

Reach for this when you cannot remember a formula but do remember the units of everything that goes into it.

Practise: Mock 5 Paper 1 Q3 · Mock 6 Paper 1 Q9

Read a constant's dimensions off the equation that defines it

1 question

Reach for this whenever a constant appears with no stated units, because the equation that introduces it always fixes them.

Practise: Mock 2 Paper 1 Q6

Whatever sits inside a sine, a log or an exponential carries no units

0 questions

Reach for this whenever an angle, an exponent or a logarithm appears, since anything carrying units inside one of them signals an earlier mistake.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Dimensions give you the form, never the factor of 2 pi

0 questions

Reach for this when reporting a dimensionally derived result, so you claim the scaling you have earned and not a numerical factor you have not.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Per what? Name the denominator of every rate and every density

3 questions

Reach for this whenever the words per, density, intensity or specific appear, because the denominator decides what the quantity actually means.

Practise: Mock 2 Paper 1 Q3 · Mock 3 Paper 1 Q2 · Mock 5 Paper 1 Q9

Working in symbols, substituting last

Substituting numbers early throws away everything except the number. Carrying symbols to the last line keeps the answer checkable by dimensions and by limits, makes cancellations visible, and turns a single result into a general one. It also makes the most common kind of physics question, the one that asks what happens to B when A doubles, answerable by inspection rather than by two full calculations. These families cover working symbolically, scaling and proportionality arguments, and the small algebraic habits that keep a long derivation readable.

Carry the symbols to the last line, then substitute once

3 questions

Reach for this by default, since a symbolic final line can be checked dimensionally, checked in limits and reused, while a decimal can be checked against nothing.

Practise: Mock 3 Paper 1 Q7 · Mock 3 Paper 1 Q12 · Mock 4 Paper 1 Q14

If it cancels, ask why you were never given it

3 questions

Reach for this when a quantity you expected to need never appears in the answer, because understanding why it cancels is usually the point of the question.

Practise: Mock 3 Paper 1 Q20 · Mock 5 Paper 1 Q7 · Mock 6 Paper 1 Q20

Measure each variable in units of something the problem already supplies

0 questions

Reach for this when the problem supplies a natural length, time or energy, so the algebra reduces to a statement about pure numbers.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Keep the intermediates exact and round only the final line

2 questions

Reach for this in any multi-step calculation, where early rounding both loses accuracy and hides the cancellations that reveal the structure.

Practise: Mock 2 Paper 1 Q12 · Mock 4 Paper 1 Q12

Write the proportionality first, worry about the constant later

1 question

Reach for this when the relationship matters more than the number, so the physics is settled before the bookkeeping starts.

Practise: Mock 3 Paper 1 Q6

A straight line on log axes is a power law, and the gradient is its exponent

0 questions

Reach for this when data or a graph is claimed to follow a power law, because on logarithmic axes the exponent is simply a gradient.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Identifying the dominant effect

A real problem contains more effects than any solution can carry, so the work is deciding which ones matter and saying so out loud. That means comparing terms by size rather than by appearance, using small-quantity approximations only where they are genuinely valid, identifying the two effects that balance, and separating processes that run on very different timescales. It also means recognising the case where a neglected term is the entire answer, because the large contributions cancelled. These families cover approximating deliberately, and being able to defend the approximation afterwards.

Name what you are neglecting, and why it is small

0 questions

Reach for this in any modelling answer, because naming the neglected effect turns a silent assumption into a decision a reader can follow and challenge.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Small angle: sine, tangent and the angle itself agree

0 questions

Reach for this when angles stay well under about a tenth of a radian, which is what turns a pendulum or a lens problem into a linear one.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Keep the first correction and drop the rest

0 questions

Reach for this when a quantity is raised to a power and one part of it is small, so the exact expression becomes a value plus a small correction.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Push a parameter to zero or to infinity and see what survives

2 questions

Reach for this when a formula is hard to interpret, since its behaviour at the extremes usually says plainly what it means.

Practise: Mock 2 Paper 1 Q18 · Mock 3 Paper 1 Q19

Size the terms against each other before you keep them all

1 question

Reach for this before simplifying, because whether a term can be dropped is a question about numbers, not about how the term looks.

Practise: Mock 3 Paper 1 Q3

Separate the fast process from the slow one, and freeze whichever you can

0 questions

Reach for this when two processes run at very different rates, so one can be treated as instantaneous and the other as frozen.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Two effects balance, and the third is a correction

2 questions

Reach for this when an equation has three or more competing terms, since the physics normally lives in whichever two balance each other.

Practise: Mock 2 Paper 1 Q4 · Mock 4 Paper 1 Q9

When the big terms cancel, the small one is the answer

0 questions

Reach for this when the leading contributions cancel, which is exactly when the term you were about to neglect becomes the whole answer.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Pick the crudest model that still contains the effect you are asked about

1 question

Reach for this at the start of an open problem, choosing the crudest idealisation that still contains the effect you have been asked about.

Practise: Mock 4 Paper 1 Q2

Close to equilibrium, every restoring force looks like Hooke's law

0 questions

Reach for this when a system sits near a stable point, since almost any restoring force is linear there and the motion is simple harmonic.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Sanity-checking against physical reality

An answer is not finished when the algebra stops. Every result can be tested against a case you already know, against a symmetry, against a conservation law, against the direction it ought to move in, and against whether a quantity that size could exist in the world at all. These checks cost seconds and catch the errors that re-reading the working will not, because they interrogate the result rather than the process that produced it. These families cover the checks worth running on every answer, in roughly the order that finds mistakes fastest.

Ask whether that number could be true of the world you live in

1 question

Reach for this before writing any number down, by asking whether a person could ever have noticed a quantity of that size.

Practise: Mock 5 Paper 1 Q4

Does it grow where it obviously should grow?

0 questions

Reach for this when a formula contains several variables, testing that each one moves the answer in the direction physical intuition demands.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Nothing may exceed a bound that nature enforces

3 questions

Reach for this whenever an answer approaches a hard limit such as the speed of light, absolute zero, unit probability or perfect efficiency.

Practise: Mock 2 Paper 1 Q14 · Mock 3 Paper 1 Q13 · Mock 4 Paper 1 Q4

Predict the answer first, then explain any disagreement

0 questions

Reach for this before a long calculation, so you have an independent expectation to compare the finished result against.

Practise: No question drills this yet

Count the unknowns against the equations before you start solving

3 questions

Reach for this when you are unsure whether a problem is solvable as stated, before spending effort on algebra that cannot close.

Practise: Mock 4 Paper 1 Q13 · Mock 5 Paper 1 Q5 · Mock 5 Paper 1 Q11

Scroll to Top