ESAT Practice Set 1B · Advanced Mathematics

ESAT Practice Set 1B Advanced Mathematics Worked Solutions

Five questions from ESAT Practice Set 1B, written to the depth of a full paper, with a worked solution for every one. A practice set is deliberately short: five questions in one module, at ESAT pace, from the same bank that writes the unseen papers schools commission here, so every question published on this page is retired from every school pack. For the full 27-question sitting, use the four complete papers. Part of the ESAT preparation guide.

Question 1

Back to top ↑

A test rig drives a coil with voltage $V=9\cos(3t)$ volts, $t$ in seconds. A comparator fires whenever the voltage is exactly $5$ volts. How many times does it fire in $0\leq t\leq 2\pi$?

  • A. 3
  • B. 6
  • C. 12
  • D. 18
  • E. 10

Key Idea (💡): A curve of the form $y=a\cos(bt)$ keeps the shape of the plain cosine: the number outside the bracket stretches it vertically, so the curve rises to $a$ and falls to $-a$, and the number inside compresses it horizontally, so one complete oscillation occupies $2\pi/b$ instead of $2\pi$. Counting how often such a curve takes a stated value is then a counting exercise and not an equation to solve: the window $0\leq t\leq 2\pi$ holds $b$ complete oscillations, and a horizontal line strictly between the peak and the trough meets each complete oscillation exactly twice, once on the way up and once on the way down.

Shortcut rehearsed: Count the turns the argument makes, not the turns of $t$

ESAT specification: MM8.1 - Recognise and be able to sketch the graphs of common functions that appear in this specification: these include lines...

Reveal the answer & worked solution: commit to an option first

Correct Answer: B. 6

Fastest Approach (🚀):
The amplitude $9$ does no work here beyond confirming that $5$ sits inside the range, so read the $3$ inside the bracket, take $2\times3$ and move on. Where between the peak and the trough the level sits never changes the count.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Check that the level is reached at all

The instants to count are the solutions of $9\cos(3t)=5$. The curve rises to $9$ and falls to $-9$, and $5$ lies strictly between those two values, so the horizontal line at height $5$ does cut the curve, and it cuts it away from both the peak and the trough.

2. Count the oscillations inside the window

The $3$ inside the bracket compresses one complete oscillation into $\frac{2\pi}{3}$, so the window $0\leq t\leq 2\pi$ holds exactly $3$ complete oscillations of the cosine wave.

3. Two crossings in each oscillation

A horizontal line strictly between the peak and the trough is met twice in every complete oscillation, once as the curve climbs and once as it falls back. The curve takes the same value at $t=2\pi$ as at $t=0$, and that value is not $5$, so nothing is gained or lost at the ends of the window.

$2\times3=6$

Sanity check: the amplitude $9$ decides only whether the level is reached, never how often, so $18$ answers a question about a different curve.

The key is $6$.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

  • A. 3 · One crossing counted per oscillation
    Takes the level to be reached once each time the wave comes round. The window $0\leq t\leq 2\pi$ holds $3$ complete oscillations, so this gives $3$. A horizontal line strictly between the peak $9$ and the trough $-9$ is met twice in every oscillation, once as the curve climbs and once as it falls, so the count is $2\times3=6$.
  • C. 12 · Crossings of the negative level included
    Counts the crossings of $-5$ alongside those of $5$, on the ground that the value has size $5$ either way: $6+6=12$. On those extra occasions the curve is at $-5$, which is not the level the question asks about.
  • D. 18 · Amplitude read as the oscillation count
    Reads $9$, the number in front of the cosine, as the count of oscillations in the window, and doubles it: $2\times9=18$. That number is a vertical stretch and sets only how high the curve rises; the $3$ inside the bracket is what decides how many oscillations fit into $0\leq t\leq 2\pi$.
  • E. 10 · Level read as the oscillation count
    Reads $5$, the level the curve has to reach, as the number multiplying $t$ inside the bracket, and doubles it: $2\times5=10$. The level says what is being looked for; the $3$ inside the bracket says how often the curve comes round to it.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Counting one crossing per oscillation. It is tempting to picture the wave reaching $5$ once each time it comes round, which gives $3$, but a horizontal line strictly between the peak $9$ and the trough $-9$ is cut twice in every complete oscillation, once on the climb and once on the fall. The count is $2\times3=6$.

Takeaway (📌):
The Cheat Code: For $a\cos(bt)=c$ with $c$ strictly between $-a$ and $a$, never solve for $t$. Count the oscillations the window holds, which is $b$ of them across $0$ to $2\pi$, and double it. The number inside the bracket multiplies the crossings; the number outside it only decides whether there are any.

Question 2

Back to top ↑

The curve $y = 3x^2 - 3x - 1$ is cut in two places by the line $y = 3x + 1$. Give the horizontal distance between the two points of intersection, correct to 3 significant figures.

  • A. 2.58
  • B. 1.53
  • C. 2.31
  • D. 1.91
  • E. 1.15

Key Idea (💡): At an intersection the line and the curve share both coordinates, so setting their two expressions for $y$ equal removes $y$ and leaves one quadratic in $x$. Every term of the line has to cross over, the constant as well as the $x$ term, or the quadratic is not the right one. Once it is collected, the two roots sit symmetrically about the axis of symmetry, so their separation is fixed by the discriminant and the leading coefficient alone.

Shortcut rehearsed: Root separation is the square root of the discriminant over $a$

ESAT specification: MM1.4 - Simultaneous equations: analytical solution by substitution, e.g

Reveal the answer & worked solution: commit to an option first

Correct Answer: A. 2.58

Fastest Approach (🚀):
The roots themselves are not needed. Collect the substitution to $3x^2 - 6x - 2 = 0$, read $(-6)^2 - 4(3)(-2) = 60$ off the discriminant, then divide $\sqrt{60}$ by $3$. That is two lines of work with no root to evaluate and no fraction to simplify.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Substitute the line into the curve

Both equations give $y$, so at an intersection

$3x + 1 = 3x^2 - 3x - 1$

Taking every term of the line across, the $x$ term and the constant together, leaves one quadratic:

$3x^2 - 6x - 2 = 0$

Its $x$ coefficient is $-6$ and its constant is $-2$.

2. Evaluate the discriminant

With leading coefficient $3$,

$(-6)^2 - 4(3)(-2) = 60$

It is positive, which is consistent with the two crossings the question describes.

3. Take the difference of the roots

$x = \dfrac{-(-6) \pm \sqrt{60}}{2(3)}$, so the two roots differ by

$\dfrac{2\sqrt{60}}{2(3)} = \dfrac{\sqrt{60}}{3} = 2.58$ to 3 significant figures.

The centre the two roots sit either side of cancels in that subtraction and never has to be worked out.

Sanity check

The roots are near $-0.291$ and $2.29$, which are roughly $2.58$ apart. Between them $3x^2 - 6x - 2$ is negative and outside them it is positive, as a quadratic with a positive $x^2$ coefficient and two real roots must be.

The key is $2.58$.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

  • B. 1.53 · Solved the wrong equation
    The line was left out of the working and the curve's own $x$-intercepts were measured instead. $3x^2 - 3x - 1 = 0$ has discriminant $(-3)^2 - 4(3)(-1) = 21$, so its two roots are $\dfrac{\sqrt{21}}{3} = 1.53$ apart to 3 significant figures. Those are the points where the curve crosses the $x$-axis, not the points where it crosses $y = 3x + 1$.
  • C. 2.31 · Constant term of the line left behind
    The $x$ term of the line was taken across but its constant was not, leaving $3x^2 - 6x - 1 = 0$, whose constant is still $-1$ where the substitution makes it $-2$. Its discriminant is $(-6)^2 - 4(3)(-1) = 48$, giving $\dfrac{\sqrt{48}}{3} = 2.31$ to 3 significant figures. The constant of the line crosses over with its $x$ term, in the same move.
  • D. 1.91 · x term of the line left behind
    The constant of the line was taken across but its $x$ term was not, leaving $3x^2 - 3x - 2 = 0$, whose $x$ coefficient is still $-3$ where the substitution makes it $-6$. Its discriminant is $(-3)^2 - 4(3)(-2) = 33$, giving $\dfrac{\sqrt{33}}{3} = 1.91$ to 3 significant figures. The $x$ term of the line crosses over with its constant, in the same move.
  • E. 1.15 · Sign error in the discriminant
    The $4ac$ part of the discriminant was added rather than subtracted: $(-6)^2 + 4(3)(-2) = 12$ was used in place of $(-6)^2 - 4(3)(-2) = 60$, which gives $\dfrac{\sqrt{12}}{3} = 1.15$ to 3 significant figures. The constant of $3x^2 - 6x - 2 = 0$ is $-2$, and it enters $b^2 - 4ac$ carrying its own sign.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Taking the $x$ term of the line across but leaving its constant where it started, which collects the equation as $3x^2 - 6x - 1 = 0$ instead of $3x^2 - 6x - 2 = 0$. The constant is then $-1$ rather than $-2$, the discriminant reads $48$ rather than $60$, and every line after that is answering a different question. Both terms of the line have to be subtracted from the curve before the discriminant means anything.

Takeaway (📌):
The Cheat Code: Collect the line and the curve into a single quadratic, then the horizontal gap between the crossings is the square root of the discriminant divided by the leading coefficient, here $\dfrac{\sqrt{60}}{3}$. Neither root is ever needed, and the axis of symmetry never has to be found.

Question 3

Back to top ↑

Each term of a sequence comes from the one before it by the rule $u_{n+1}=\frac{u_{n} + 9}{2}$. Its fourth term is $12$. Determine $u_{1}$.

  • A. 33
  • B. 9
  • C. 15
  • D. 24
  • E. 21

Key Idea (💡): A first order recurrence can be run in either direction. Rearranging $u_{n+1}=f(u_{n})$ to make $u_{n}$ the subject produces an inverse rule, and applying that rule repeatedly walks the sequence back towards its starting value. The number of applications is the difference between the two indices, not the number of terms named. A recurrence of this shape also has a fixed point $L$, found by solving $L=\frac{L + 9}{2}$, and the difference between a term and $L$ is divided by $2$ at every forward step, so it is multiplied by $2$ at every backward one.

Shortcut rehearsed: Invert the rule and step back the difference between the indices

ESAT specification: MM2.1 - Sequences, including those given by a formula for the nth term and those generated by a simple recurrence relation of...

Reveal the answer & worked solution: commit to an option first

Correct Answer: A. 33

Fastest Approach (🚀):
The fixed point can be discarded on sight. Solving $L=\frac{L + 9}{2}$ gives $L = 9$, and a first term equal to $L$ would make every term equal to $L$, which contradicts $u_{4} = 12$. That removes one option for free, and the rest is $L + 2^{3} \times (3) = 33$.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Invert the rule

Make the earlier term the subject:
$$u_{n+1}=\frac{u_{n} + 9}{2} \implies 2u_{n+1} = u_{n} + 9 \implies u_{n} = 2u_{n+1} - 9$$
This rule takes any term and returns the one before it, so it can be applied as many times as needed.

2. Find the fixed point

A term equal to $L$ would reproduce itself, so $L=\frac{L + 9}{2}$, giving $2L = L + 9$, then $(2-1)L = 9$ and $L = 9$. Writing every term as $L$ plus a difference is what turns the chain into one multiplication.

3. Walk back from $u_{4}$ to $u_{1}$

The difference between the given term and the fixed point is $u_{4} - L = 12 - (9) = 3$. Each application of the inverse rule multiplies that difference by $2$, and the number of applications is the difference of the indices, $4 - 1 = 3$:
$$u_{1} = L + 2^{3} \times (3) = 9 + (24) = 33$$

Check it forwards through the original rule: $\frac{33 + 9}{2} = 21$, which is $u_{2}$, and a further $2$ forward steps return $u_{4} = 12$ as stated.

The key is $33$.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

  • B. 9 · Fixed point mistaken for the term
    The fixed point was quoted as the answer. Solving $L=\frac{L + 9}{2}$ gives $2L = L + 9$, so $(2-1)L = 9$ and $L = 9$. That is the value the sequence approaches as it runs forwards, not its first term. If $u_{1}$ were $9$ then every term would equal $9$, and the fourth term would be $9$ rather than the stated $12$.
  • C. 15 · Backward steps undercounted
    The inverse rule $u_{n} = 2u_{n+1} - 9$ was applied two times too few, stopping at $u_{3} = 15$ instead of $u_{1}$. The gap from index $4$ to index $1$ is $3$, so two further applications are still owed.
  • D. 24 · Fixed point not restored
    The multiply-by-$2$ shortcut was used but the fixed point was never added back on. $2^{3} \times (3) = 24$ is the difference between $u_{1}$ and the fixed point $9$, not $u_{1}$ itself, so $L$ still has to be added to it.
  • E. 21 · Index gap off by one
    Only $2$ applications of the inverse rule were made, so the walk stopped one index short at $u_{2} = 21$. Going from index $4$ to index $1$ needs $4 - 1 = 3$ applications, one more than were made, and it is the subscripts that fix that count rather than the terms written down.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Working with the difference from the fixed point and then forgetting to put the fixed point back. The power of $2$ scales the difference, $2^{3} \times (3) = 24$, and that is a distance rather than a term: the first term is $9 + (24) = 33$.

Takeaway (📌):
The Cheat Code: For $u_{n+1}=\frac{u_{n}+c}{k}$, solve $L=\frac{L+c}{k}$ for the fixed point first. The difference from $L$ is divided by $k$ at every forward step and multiplied by $k$ at every backward one, so $u_{1} = L + k^{m}(u_{1+m} - L)$ replaces the whole chain of substitutions. Here that reads $u_{1} = 9 + 2^{3}(12 - (9)) = 33$.

Question 4

Back to top ↑

The expression $\dfrac{\sqrt{19}-\sqrt{11}}{\sqrt{19}+\sqrt{11}}$ is to be rewritten with a rational denominator and simplified fully. Correct to 3 significant figures, what does it equal?

  • A. 7.36
  • B. 0.136
  • C. 3.89
  • D. 0.0362
  • E. -2.61

Key Idea (💡): Multiplying a sum of two surds by its own conjugate turns it into a difference of two squares, and both of those squares are rational, so the denominator becomes an ordinary integer. Here the numerator is already the conjugate of the denominator, so the same multiplication squares it and produces two rational terms together with one cross term that stays in surd form. What remains is a division of the whole numerator, every term of it, by the integer the denominator became.

Shortcut rehearsed: Multiply by the conjugate, and size the answer before calculating

ESAT specification: MM1.2 - Use and manipulation of surds

Reveal the answer & worked solution: commit to an option first

Correct Answer: B. 0.136

Fastest Approach (🚀):
The quotient has the smaller surd expression on top and the larger underneath, so its value must be positive and below $1$. That discards the negative option and both options above $1$ without any algebra, leaving two. Of those two the smaller comes from dividing by $30$ instead of by $8$, so the larger survivor is the key.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Multiply above and below by the conjugate of the denominator

The denominator is $\sqrt{19}+\sqrt{11}$, whose conjugate is $\sqrt{19}-\sqrt{11}$. Multiplying numerator and denominator by the same quantity leaves the value unchanged:
$$\dfrac{\sqrt{19}-\sqrt{11}}{\sqrt{19}+\sqrt{11}} = \frac{(\sqrt{19}-\sqrt{11})^{2}}{(\sqrt{19})^{2}-(\sqrt{11})^{2}} = \frac{(\sqrt{19}-\sqrt{11})^{2}}{19-11}$$
The denominator is now the rational number $8$.

2. Expand the numerator, then divide every term of it

$$(\sqrt{19}-\sqrt{11})^{2} = 19 - 2\sqrt{19}\sqrt{11} + 11 = 30 - 2\sqrt{209}$$
so the quotient is $\dfrac{30-2\sqrt{209}}{8}$. Both $19$ and $11$ are odd, so $30$ and $8$ are both even and the factor $2$ comes out of the whole numerator and out of the denominator together:
$$\frac{30-2\sqrt{209}}{8} = \frac{2\left(15-\sqrt{209}\right)}{2 \times 4} = \frac{15-\sqrt{209}}{4}$$
The factor cancels out of the whole bracket, not out of one term of it.

3. Put a number to the exact form

$\sqrt{209}$ is close to $14.5$, and it is smaller than $15$, since $15$ is the arithmetic mean of $19$ and $11$ while $\sqrt{209}$ is their geometric mean. The numerator is therefore positive, and to 3 significant figures the fraction $\dfrac{15-\sqrt{209}}{4}$ is $0.136$.

Sanity check

Take $\sqrt{19} \approx 4.36$ and $\sqrt{11} \approx 3.32$. The original quotient is then roughly $4.36 - 3.32$ over $4.36 + 3.32$, which is close to $0.136$. The value also has to be positive and below $1$, because $\sqrt{19}-\sqrt{11}$ is the smaller of two positive quantities and $\sqrt{19}+\sqrt{11}$ is the larger, and it is.

The key is $0.136$.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

  • A. 7.36 · Cross-term sign slip
    The cross term was expanded with the wrong sign, so $(\sqrt{19}-\sqrt{11})^{2}$ was written as $19 + 2\sqrt{209} + 11 = 30 + 2\sqrt{209}$. Dividing by the correct denominator $8$ then gives about $7.36$, which is greater than $1$, although the quotient in the stem has the smaller of the two positive quantities on top and so cannot exceed $1$. Squaring a difference subtracts the cross term.
  • C. 3.89 · Partial cancellation
    From the correct $\dfrac{30-2\sqrt{209}}{8}$ the factor $2$ was cancelled against $8$ but applied to the surd term only, leaving $\dfrac{30-\sqrt{209}}{4}$, which is about $3.89$. The whole numerator is being divided, so $30$ has to be halved to $15$ as well.
  • D. 0.0362 · Denominator added instead of differenced
    The denominator was multiplied out as $\sqrt{19}\times\sqrt{19} + \sqrt{11}\times\sqrt{11} = 19+11 = 30$ rather than as the difference of two squares $19-11 = 8$. That gives $\dfrac{30-2\sqrt{209}}{30} \approx 0.0362$, which is smaller than the true value of about $0.136$. A conjugate pair multiplies to a difference of squares, never to a sum.
  • E. -2.61 · Second square subtracted in the expansion
    The second square was subtracted rather than added while expanding the numerator: $19 - 2\sqrt{209} - 11 = 8 - 2\sqrt{209}$. Dividing by $8$ gives about $-2.61$, a negative value, although $\sqrt{19}-\sqrt{11}$ and $\sqrt{19}+\sqrt{11}$ are both positive and so their quotient cannot be negative. Both squares are added when a bracket is squared; only the cross term changes sign.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Dividing only the surd term by the rationalised denominator. Once the quotient reads $\dfrac{30-2\sqrt{209}}{8}$, the whole numerator is being divided, so $30$ has to be reduced to $15$ at the same time as the $2$ in front of the surd is taken away. Cancelling into one term only leaves a value roughly $3.89$, which is above $1$ and therefore impossible here.

Takeaway (📌):
The Cheat Code: The conjugate is the whole method. It turns $\sqrt{19}+\sqrt{11}$ into $19-11=8$ and turns the numerator into $(\sqrt{19}-\sqrt{11})^{2} = 30 - 2\sqrt{209}$. Expect the exact answer in the form $\dfrac{15-\sqrt{209}}{4}$, and divide every term of the numerator, never the surd alone.

Question 5

Back to top ↑

The positive number $x$ is such that $\dfrac{x^{5/2}\cdot x^{-3/4}}{x^{3/2}} = 3$. Which of the values below is $x^{-2}$, correct to 3 significant figures?

  • A. 0.000152
  • B. 0.00617
  • C. 0.111
  • D. 81.0
  • E. 6561

Key Idea (💡): Every factor here is a power of the one base $x$, so the entire left side is a single index sum: multiplying adds an index, dividing subtracts one, and a fractional or negative index obeys those two rules exactly as a whole one does. Collapsing the chain leaves a unit fractional power, which is a root, and undoing that root is the only equation solving the question contains. The power the stem finally asks for is then one substitution, remembering that a minus sign in an index inverts rather than negates.

Shortcut rehearsed: Total the indices in one pass, then undo the root that is left

ESAT specification: MM1.1 - Laws of indices for all rational exponents.

Reveal the answer & worked solution: commit to an option first

Correct Answer: A. 0.000152

Fastest Approach (🚀):
Total the indices in a single pass, $\tfrac{5}{2} - \tfrac{3}{4} - \tfrac{3}{2} = \tfrac{1}{4}$, so the condition reads $\sqrt[4]{x} = 3$ and $x = 81$ at sight. The value wanted is the reciprocal of $81^{2}$, so it has to be a small positive fraction, which rules out both whole number options before any arithmetic is done.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Collapse the left side to a single power of $x$

Powers of one base multiply by ADDING indices, so the numerator combines first:
$$x^{5/2}\cdot x^{-3/4} = x^{7/4}$$
Dividing by the denominator subtracts its index:
$$\frac{x^{7/4}}{x^{3/2}} = x^{1/4}$$
Run in a single pass the indices total $\tfrac{5}{2} - \tfrac{3}{4} - \tfrac{3}{2} = \tfrac{1}{4}$, so the condition in the stem is simply $x^{1/4} = 3$.

2. Solve for $x$

$x^{1/4}$ is the fourth root of $x$, and the stem fixes $x > 0$, so raising both sides to the power $4$ is safe and leaves no second solution to check:
$$x = 3^{4} = 81$$

3. Evaluate the requested power

A negative index means a reciprocal, not a negative value:
$$x^{-2} = \frac{1}{x^{2}} = \frac{1}{81^{2}} = \frac{1}{6561} = 0.000152$$
to 3 significant figures, which is the form the stem asks for.

Sanity check

Put $x = 81$ back into the left side. Its indices are the same chain as before, $\tfrac{5}{2} - \tfrac{3}{4} - \tfrac{3}{2} = \tfrac{1}{4}$, so the expression is $81^{1/4}$, and the fourth root of $81$ is $3$, as the stem requires. Since $x = 81 > 1$, every negative power of $x$ has to be a small positive fraction, so the two whole number options were never candidates.

The key is $0.000152$.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

  • B. 0.00617 · Index treated as a multiplier
    After reaching $x = 81$ the index was read as a multiplier rather than as a power, giving $\dfrac{1}{2 \times 81} = \dfrac{1}{162}$. An index of $-2$ means one over $x$ raised to the power $2$, so the denominator is $81^{2} = 6561$, and not $2 \times 81 = 162$.
  • C. 0.111 · Root not undone
    The condition $x^{1/4} = 3$ was read as $x = 3$, with the fourth root left undone, and then $3^{-2} = \dfrac{1}{9}$ was evaluated. Undoing the fourth root comes first: raising both sides to the power $4$ gives $x = 3^{4} = 81$, which is not $3$.
  • D. 81.0 · Intermediate value reported
    The index chain was carried out correctly as far as $x = 81$, and that value was reported. The stem asks for $x^{-2}$ and not for $x$, so $81$ is the intermediate result rather than the answer, and a negative power of a number larger than 1 is always smaller than 1.
  • E. 6561 · Negative index ignored
    The minus sign in the index was dropped, so $x^{2} = 81^{2} = 6561$ was evaluated instead of $x^{-2}$. A negative index inverts the power rather than negating it, so the value wanted is the reciprocal of $6561$.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Adding the denominator's index instead of subtracting it, so that $\tfrac{5}{2} - \tfrac{3}{4} - \tfrac{3}{2} = \tfrac{1}{4}$ is run with the wrong sign on $3/2$. The condition then reads $x^{p} = 3$ for an index $p$ that is usually not a unit fraction at all, and that awkwardness is itself the signal that the division step was mishandled.

Takeaway (📌):
The Cheat Code: Collapse a tower of powers of one base into a single index before doing anything else. Once the left side is $x^{1/4}$ the equation is one root to undo, $x = 3^{4} = 81$, and the quantity actually asked for is a single substitution away.

Where to go next

  • Next: ESAT Paper 1 Advanced Maths worked solutions, the full 27-question paper in the same subject.
  • Five questions at test pace in Advanced Maths: practice set 1A and set 1B, each worked in full.
  • The full 27-question sitting, with a timed test at the top of the page: the four complete papers, one Advanced Maths module in each.
  • Every paper and practice set across all five ESAT subjects is indexed on the ESAT preparation guide.
  • Teaching a cohort rather than sitting the test? A free ESAT sample pack holds 10 of the 27 questions in every module, with the worked solutions and mark schemes in full, and unseen packs are written for individual schools.
  • If the method is the problem rather than the answer, Lucas runs 1-on-1 ESAT tutoring for Cambridge, Oxford and Imperial applicants: apply for admissions tutoring.

For individual preparation. These questions are free for a candidate working on their own. They are not licensed for a school, college or tutoring provider to print and run with a class, to republish or resell, or to fold into a course sold by another provider. A school sitting a timed mock is welcome to the free sample pack, which comes with mark schemes and invigilator instructions, and a paper written for your own candidates and used nowhere else is a commissioned pack.

Where to go from here

Everything on this page is free and stays free. These are the things worth doing next.

One-to-one places are limited and taken by application, not by the hour. This site is independent of UAT-UK, which administers the ESAT, and of every university that uses it; nothing here is endorsed by them, and the official specification and past papers remain the final word.