ESAT Paper 3 Chemistry Sample Questions

Correct Answer: C. 4212

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Total the electrons

The atom is neutral, so it holds one electron for every proton: $34$ electrons. Each one is $\frac{1}{1836}$ on the relative mass scale, so together they come to

2. Divide the nuclear mass by that total

Every nucleon has relative mass $1$, so the nucleus of $^{78}_{34}\mathrm{Se}$ weighs its mass number: $34$ protons and $44$ neutrons give $34 + 44 = 78$. Dividing by a fraction means multiplying by its reciprocal:

Sanity check by a second route: one nucleon outweighs one electron by $1836$, and there are $78$ nucleons against $34$ electrons, so the factor is $1836 \times \frac{78}{34} = 4212$. The two routes agree, and a factor of several thousand is exactly what the claim that almost all of an atom's mass sits in its nucleus amounts to numerically.

The key is $4212$.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

• A. 54 · Intermediate value quoted
  Stops one line early. The working $\frac{34}{1836} = \frac{1}{54}$ gives the electrons' combined relative mass, and the $54$ sitting in that fraction is quoted as the answer. It is only a denominator, and the nuclear mass of $78$ has not been used at all.
• B. 2376 · Protons omitted from the nucleus
  Counts only the $44$ neutrons as the mass of the nucleus, forgetting that each of the $34$ protons also carries relative mass $1$, and computes $44 \times 54 = 2376$ in place of $78 \times 54$.
• D. 143208 · One electron instead of all
  Compares the whole nucleus with a single electron: $78 \times 1836 = 143208$. The figure $1836$ is the factor for one electron only, so this overshoots by a factor of $34$, the number of electrons the neutral atom actually has.
• E. 6048 · Mass number read as the neutron count
  Reads the mass number as neutrons alone and then adds the protons on top, making the nucleus $78 + 34 = 112$ nucleons and giving $112 \times 54 = 6048$. The mass number $78$ already counts the $34$ protons, so adding them a second time counts them twice.
• F. 78 · Nucleus compared with one nucleon
  Compares the nucleus with a single particle of relative mass $1$ rather than with the electrons, which hands back the mass number itself: $78$. The comparison asked for is against all $34$ electrons of the neutral atom together, and their combined relative mass is $\frac{34}{1836} = \frac{1}{54}$, not $1$. Dividing by that fraction multiplies by $54$, so the factor is $78 \times 54 = 4212$.
• G. 4869072 · Reciprocal formed by multiplying instead of flipping
  Divides by $\frac{34}{1836}$ by multiplying by $1836 \times 34$: $1836 \times 78 \times 34$. Flipping a fraction sends the $34$ underneath rather than leaving it on top, so the multiplier is $\frac{1836}{34} = 54$ and the factor is $78 \times 54 = 4212$, which this option exceeds by a factor of $34^2$.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Building the electron total from the wrong number, or not building it at all. A neutral atom of selenium has $34$ electrons because it has $34$ protons, so the mass to divide by is $\frac{34}{1836}$ and not $\frac{1}{1836}$. Using the single-electron figure leaves the answer too large by a factor of $34$.

Takeaway (📌):
Nucleons weigh $1$ each and electrons weigh $\frac{1}{1836}$ each, so every question of this shape collapses to the mass number times $1836$, divided by the number of electrons. Build that single fraction first and cancel before multiplying anything out.

Correct Answer: F. 14

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Use the charge to convert electrons into protons

The two figures given describe different parts of the atom, and only one of them is affected by the charge. This $3-$ ion has gained three electrons, which leaves it with three electrons more than protons, so the proton count is recovered from the electron count directly:

$Z = 10 - 3 = 7$

2. Total the nucleons

Mass number means protons plus neutrons. The $7$ neutrons were given, the $7$ protons have just been found, and the electrons play no part because they are far too light to register:

$A = 7 + 7 = 14$

Sanity check: a mass number must come out larger than the neutron count on its own, because the protons take up the rest of it, so $7$ was never a candidate. Reading $^{14}_{7}\mathrm{X}$ backwards returns $14 - 7 = 7$ neutrons, as measured.

The key is $14$.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

• A. 7 · Neutron count read as the mass number
  Stops at the neutrons. The mass number counts protons and neutrons together, so $7$ omits every one of the $7$ protons; neutrons are never printed on their own in $^{A}_{Z}\mathrm{X}$: they are only ever the difference $A - Z$.
• B. 17 · Ion treated as a neutral atom
  Reads the $10$ electrons straight off as the proton count, which is true only of a neutral atom. This ion has gained three electrons, so the protons come to $10 - 3 = 7$ and the mass number to $7 + 7 = 14$.
• C. 20 · Charge applied in the wrong direction
  Moves the electron count the wrong way. This $3-$ ion has gained three electrons, so it holds three electrons more than protons and the proton count is $10 - 3 = 7$, not $13$.
• D. 24 · Electrons counted into the mass number
  Adds the $10$ electrons to the nucleons as well. An electron is far too light to register in a mass number, which totals the $7$ protons and the $7$ neutrons and nothing else.
• E. 11 · Charge applied a second time
  Uses the charge twice. It turns the electron count into the proton count once, $10 - 3 = 7$, and this option applies the same correction again to the finished total: $14 - 3$. A mass number counts the $7$ protons and the $7$ neutrons and nothing else, so once the charge has delivered the protons its work is done and $A = 7 + 7 = 14$.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Treating the ion as though it were neutral. Only in a neutral atom does the electron count double as the proton count; this ion has gained three electrons, so its $10$ electrons and its $7$ protons differ by $3$, and using $10$ as the atomic number shifts the mass number by that same $3$.

Takeaway (📌):
Electrons are a clue, not an answer. Apply the charge to reach the protons, $10 - 3 = 7$, then add the $7$ neutrons. Nothing on a nuclide label ever counts electrons or neutrons for you.

Correct Answer: E. 0.8

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Recover the total volume of carbon dioxide

A mean rate is the total change divided by the time it took, so the total is the rate multiplied by the interval. Only the carbon dioxide reaches the syringe, so its reading follows that one substance:

2. Convert to moles of carbon dioxide, then to moles of potassium hydrogencarbonate

The balanced equation pairs $2\,\mathrm{KHCO_3}$ with $1\,\mathrm{CO_2}$, so the amount of potassium hydrogencarbonate is $\tfrac{2}{1}$ times the amount of carbon dioxide:

3. Convert the amount to a mass

Check the units before committing. Dividing $96\,\mathrm{cm^3}$ by a molar volume quoted in $\mathrm{dm^3}$ would have given $4\,\mathrm{mol}$ of carbon dioxide and a final mass of $800\,\mathrm{g}$, which a syringe holding $96\,\mathrm{cm^3}$ cannot account for.

The key is $0.8$.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

• A. 0.008 · Amount in moles reported as a mass
  The amount in moles was written down as though it were already a mass: $n(\mathrm{KHCO_3})=0.008\,\mathrm{mol}$ was quoted as $0.008\,\mathrm{g}$. The last conversion is still owed, and it is the one the stem hands over: multiplying by $M_r(\mathrm{KHCO_3})=100$ gives $0.8$.
• B. 0.4 · Stoichiometric ratio ignored
  The equation's coefficients were skipped and the amount of potassium hydrogencarbonate was set equal to the amount of carbon dioxide, $0.004\,\mathrm{mol}$ rather than $0.008\,\mathrm{mol}$, before multiplying by $100$. The equation pairs $2\,\mathrm{KHCO_3}$ with $1\,\mathrm{CO_2}$, so the amount of potassium hydrogencarbonate is $\tfrac{2}{1}$ times the amount of carbon dioxide, and this option is the key $0.8$ scaled by $\tfrac{1}{2}$.
• C. 1.104 · Wrong relative formula mass used
  The right amount, $0.008\,\mathrm{mol}$, was multiplied by the relative formula mass of potassium carbonate instead: $138$ rather than the $100$ the stem supplies. $M_r(\mathrm{K_2CO_3})=138$ is genuine, but it belongs to another substance in the equation, and the question asks for the mass of potassium hydrogencarbonate.
• D. 800 · Molar volume units mismatched
  The volume was left in $\mathrm{cm^3}$ and divided by a molar volume quoted in $\mathrm{dm^3}$: $96\div24=4\,\mathrm{mol}$ of carbon dioxide instead of $0.004\,\mathrm{mol}$. One mole of gas occupies $24\,\mathrm{dm^3}$, which is $24000\,\mathrm{cm^3}$, so this option is the key $0.8$ multiplied by a thousand.
• F. 0.2 · Mole ratio turned upside down
  The equation's coefficients were read the wrong way up. The $0.004\,\mathrm{mol}$ of carbon dioxide was scaled by $\tfrac{1}{2}$ instead of $\tfrac{2}{1}$ before the relative formula mass was applied, so this option is the key $0.8$ divided by $\left(\tfrac{2}{1}\right)^2$. The equation pairs $2\,\mathrm{KHCO_3}$ with $1\,\mathrm{CO_2}$, and it is the potassium hydrogencarbonate that is being counted, so the amount wanted is $0.008\,\mathrm{mol}$ and the mass is $0.8$.
• G. 19.2 · Molar volume never divided in
  The volume was converted to $\mathrm{dm^3}$ and then treated as though it were already an amount: $0.096$ went straight into the $2$ to $1$ scaling and then into the multiplication by $100$, with no division by the molar volume anywhere. A volume becomes an amount only by dividing by $24\,\mathrm{dm^3\,mol^{-1}}$, which turns $0.096\,\mathrm{dm^3}$ into $0.004\,\mathrm{mol}$, so this option is the key $0.8$ multiplied by $24$.
• H. 1.6 · Equation coefficient counted a second time
  The $2$ to $1$ from the equation was used twice: once correctly, turning $0.004\,\mathrm{mol}$ of carbon dioxide into $0.008\,\mathrm{mol}$ of potassium hydrogencarbonate, and again at the mass step, as though the coefficient scaled the relative formula mass as well. It does not: $M_r(\mathrm{KHCO_3})=100$ means one mole of potassium hydrogencarbonate has a mass of $100\,\mathrm{g}$ whatever the equation's coefficients are, so the mass is $0.008\times100=0.8$ and the ratio is spent once.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Starting the mole calculation from the rate itself. A figure in $\mathrm{cm^3\,s^{-1}}$ is not a volume, so it has to be multiplied by the $120\,\mathrm{s}$ interval before the molar gas volume can be used; feeding $0.8$ straight into the division gives an amount $120$ times too small.

Takeaway (📌):
Rate times time gives the volume of carbon dioxide; the molar gas volume, the $2$ to $1$ from the balanced equation and $M_r(\mathrm{KHCO_3})=100$ then run the chain backwards to the potassium hydrogencarbonate. Following a product is only ever a way of following the reactant that made it.

Correct Answer: F. 6

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Find the amount of iron displaced

The manganese is in excess, so every iron ion reacts and the iron(II) sulfate is the limiting reagent. The volume in cubic decimetres is $0.05\ \text{dm}^3$, so

The reaction is $\mathrm{Mn} + \mathrm{Fe^{2+}} \rightarrow \mathrm{Mn^{2+}} + \mathrm{Fe}$, one iron atom for each iron ion, so $0.01\ \text{mol}$ of iron is displaced.

2. Convert that amount into a total heat

3. Turn the heat into a temperature rise

What warms up is the $50\ \text{cm}^3$ of solution, and at a density of $1\ \text{g cm}^{-3}$ that is $50\ \text{g}$. The metal's mass is ignored and the cup loses no heat, so all $1260\ \text{J}$ goes into the solution. Rearranging $Q = mc\Delta T$,

Sanity check: $210\ \text{J}$ raises this solution by one degree, and $1260$ is $6$ times $210$, so $6$ degrees. Notice that the volume never reaches the answer: it fixes the amount reacting and the mass warmed in the same proportion, so it cancels, and the rise depends only on the concentration, the energy per mole, the density and the specific heat capacity.

The temperature rise is $6\ ^\circ\text{C}$.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

• A. 0.6 · Volume conversion off by ten
  The volume was divided by $10000$ instead of $1000$, $50\ \text{cm}^3$ taken as $0.005\ \text{dm}^3$, giving $n = 0.001\ \text{mol}$ and $Q = 0.126\ \text{kJ}$, then $126 \div 210 = 0.6$. A $\text{dm}^3$ is a thousand $\text{cm}^3$, so the volume is $0.05\ \text{dm}^3$ and the amount reacting is ten times larger than this.
• B. 3 · Ionic charge used as a mole ratio
  The $2+$ charge on the iron ion was used as a stoichiometric factor and the amount divided by $2$ to $0.005\ \text{mol}$: $0.005 \times 126 = 0.63\ \text{kJ}$ and $630 \div 210 = 3$. The charge counts the electrons transferred, not the atoms: each iron ion gives one iron atom, so the amount stays at $0.01\ \text{mol}$.
• C. 25.2 · Specific heat capacity omitted
  The specific heat capacity was dropped from the denominator: $1260 \div 50 = 25.2$. Dividing joules by a mass alone leaves $\text{J g}^{-1}$, an energy per gram and not a temperature at all; it is the $4.2$ that turns joules per gram into degrees.
• D. 600 · Scaling by the amount omitted
  The per-mole figure was treated as the total heat released: $126\ \text{kJ} = 126000\ \text{J}$ and $126000 \div 210 = 600$. Only $0.01\ \text{mol}$ of iron is displaced, so only that fraction of the $126\ \text{kJ}$ is ever given out, and $600$ is the rise a whole mole would produce.
• E. 0.006 · Kilojoules divided by a joules-per-degree
  The amount and the heat are both right, $0.01\ \text{mol}$ giving $1.26\ \text{kJ}$, but that heat was divided by $210$ while still in kilojoules. A specific heat capacity of $4.2\ \text{J g}^{-1}\,^\circ\text{C}^{-1}$ prices a degree in JOULES, so the heat has to be rewritten as $1260\ \text{J}$ before it meets $210$, and $1260 \div 210 = 6$, a thousand times this.
• G. 120 · Concentration read off as the amount
  A concentration is a count of moles per cubic decimetre, not a count of moles. Taking $0.2\ \text{mol dm}^{-3}$ as $0.2\ \text{mol}$ of iron leaves the volume out of the amount reacting, and the rise then comes out as $6 \div 0.05$. Only $0.05\ \text{dm}^3$ was poured, so the amount is $0.2 \times 0.05 = 0.01\ \text{mol}$ and the rise is $6\ ^\circ\text{C}$.
• H. 1.26 · The heat reported instead of the rise
  This is where the calculation stands after two steps and not at the end: $0.01 \times 126 = 1.26\ \text{kJ}$ is the heat the displacement gives out, in kilojoules, and the question asks how much warmer the solution gets, in $^\circ\text{C}$. Warming $50\ \text{g}$ of solution by one degree costs $50 \times 4.2 = 210\ \text{J}$, so $1260\ \text{J}$ buys $6\ ^\circ\text{C}$.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Dividing the heat by the amount instead of multiplying, out of habit from the more familiar calorimetry question that asks for kilojoules per mole. Here the energy per mole is handed over, $126\ \text{kJ}$, and the temperature rise is what is wanted, so the amount $0.01\ \text{mol}$ multiplies up to a total heat of $1260\ \text{J}$ first, and only then does $Q = mc\Delta T$ get rearranged.

Takeaway (📌):
Work out what one degree costs before anything else. The product $mc$ is the price of a degree in joules, here $210\ \text{J}$, and every calorimetry question that supplies the mass and the specific heat capacity is then either a heat divided by that price or that price multiplied by a rise.

Correct Answer: C. 38

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. Read the two numbers off the label, then take the difference

The label gives the nuclide as $^{69}_{31}\mathrm{Ga}$. The lower figure is the atomic number, $Z = 31$, and it counts protons only: it is what makes the sample gallium rather than anything else. The upper figure is the mass number, $A = 69$, and it counts protons and neutrons together, because the electrons are far too light to register in it. Neutrons appear in $A$ and nowhere else on the label, so removing the protons from the mass number leaves them:

$n = A - Z = 69 - 31 = 38$

Sanity check: the neutron count cannot equal or exceed the mass number, since the protons take up part of it, so $69$ and $100$ are impossible before any arithmetic is attempted.

The key is $38$.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong (❌):

• A. 31 · Reads Z as the neutron count
  Quotes the atomic number instead of subtracting it. $Z = 31$ is the proton count, and the neutrons are what is left of the mass number once those protons are removed, $69 - 31$, so $31$ answers a different question.
• B. 69 · Reads A as the neutron count
  Reads the mass number as a neutron count. $A = 69$ is protons and neutrons together, so it already contains the $31$ protons and overstates the neutrons by exactly that many.
• D. 100 · Addition for subtraction
  Adds the two numbers, $69 + 31 = 100$, instead of subtracting them. That would make the nucleus heavier than the mass number printed on its own label.
• E. 7 · Subtracts Z twice
  Takes the protons off and then the electrons as well, $69 - 31 - 31 = 7$. The neutral atom does have $31$ electrons, but they sit outside the nucleus and were never counted in the mass number, so $Z$ comes off once only.

Common Mistake (⚠️):
Quoting the upper number as the neutron count. The mass number is protons and neutrons added together, not neutrons alone, so $69$ silently includes the $31$ protons and overstates the neutrons by exactly that many.

Takeaway (📌):
The bottom number identifies, the top number weighs. Protons come straight from the bottom number, neutrons only from the difference, and nothing on a nuclide label ever counts neutrons for you.