Instrumentation & measurement

Experimental aerothermal methods

A coherent thread through open-hardware pneumatic probes, multi-facility calibration, and rigorous uncertainty propagation, the measurement layer behind turbomachinery research at the Oxford Thermofluids Institute and peer-reviewed work on publications.

Not sure where to start? 4 places to go

Start with your question

Why visitors arrive: You work with pneumatic probes, turbine rigs, or aerothermal instrumentation and need methods guidance.

Your question: How are multi-hole probes calibrated, transferred between facilities, and uncertainty-budgeted?

You may also be asking

  • What is the difference between 3-hole and 5-hole probes?
  • Where is the Oxford open-hardware probe work?
  • Is there an interactive uncertainty tool?

Where to go next

Why measurement discipline matters

High-speed aerothermal experiments fail quietly when instrumentation error is treated as an afterthought. A biased pressure tap, an uncorrected yaw calibration, or a facility-specific polynomial fit can shift inferred loss coefficients and cooling effectiveness by margins that dominate the physics under study, as seen when merging multi-facility 5-hole probe datasets and inferring loss on ECAT rainbow vane sets for the HPT deterioration programme.

On this site that posture is documented in the Oxford open-hardware probe manuscript (in preparation), the live 3-hole probe uncertainty note, and ECAT campaign logs on the HPT project, measurement as part of the model, not an afterthought.

Pneumatic probe workflow

The following sequence is common across Oxford turbine campaigns and open-hardware probe benchmarking, details vary by facility, but the documentation structure stays the same.

  1. Angular calibration: sweep a probe through a known uniform flow; fit yaw coefficients and pressure-recovery polynomials
  2. Coefficient reduction: non-dimensional groups linking port pressures to flow angle, total pressure, and static pressure
  3. Uncertainty budget: separate bias (transducer, alignment, polynomial fit) from precision (repeatability, tunnel unsteadiness)
  4. Facility transfer: compare calibration accuracy across tunnels before merging datasets (see 5-hole probe project)
  5. Publication & tools: formalise derivations in notes; implement correlations in calculators when stable

Resources on this site

Pneumatic probes overview

Technical note · Reference

Orientation to 3-hole, 5-hole, and 7-hole configurations, when each fits, calibration and facility-transfer workflow, and pointers to uncertainty derivations.

Measurement uncertainty fundamentals

Technical note · Reference

Foundational vocabulary for bias, precision, and propagation, the layer beneath instrument-specific derivations.

3-hole probe uncertainty analysis

Technical note · Live

Full derivation of bias and precision propagation for three-hole pneumatic probes, calibration coefficients, partial derivatives, and Reynolds-number sensitivity. Suitable as a methods reference alongside experimental campaigns.

Multi-facility 5-hole probe cross-calibration

Project · Experimental campaign

Open-hardware probe benchmarking across European wind tunnels, applies the uncertainty framework in a multi-facility context and informs the Oxford probe manuscript in preparation.

Experimental aerothermal measurement

Article · Methods overview

Long-form essay on traceability, similarity, and facility transfer, the narrative layer above short notes and below peer-reviewed papers.

CFD-experiment validation

Article · Simulation & measurement

Closing the loop between RANS campaigns and transient aerothermal data, observables, boundary conditions, and uncertainty, tied to the HPT deterioration programme.

Part of

This page sits within the broader knowledge structure on lucasrey.com:

  • Engineering - Central knowledge platform - tools, curriculum, notes, and research assets.
  • Research - Peer-reviewed and technical publications in aerothermal and fluid engineering.

Related content from the same research and engineering work:

Part of Engineering

This page is part of the engineering knowledge platform on lucasrey.com.

Engineering knowledge platform

More tools, curriculum, notes, and research from the same body of work:

  • Engineering - Central knowledge platform - tools, curriculum, notes, research, and applied engineering work.
  • Collaborate - Industry advisory, aerothermal R&D collaboration, and venture partnerships.

Where to go from here

Everything on this site is free to read. These are the things worth doing next.

Everything linked above is free and stays free. One-to-one places are limited and taken by application, not by the hour.